Comparison Overview
Hyperliquid vs Aster
Hyperliquid and Aster both target perpetual traders, but their current positioning is different. Hyperliquid is the stronger default for users prioritizing deeper liquidity, Hyperliquid L1, and a high-performance order book. Aster is worth comparing if lower recorded fees, Arbitrum/Optimism access, and a newer perpetual protocol workflow matter to you. Before signing up, verify live fees, supported markets, risk parameters, and the registration link on the official site.
Core Facts
| Platform | Hyperliquid | Aster |
|---|---|---|
| Maker / Taker | 0.02% / 0.05% | 0.015% / 0.045% |
| Chains | Hyperliquid L1 | Arbitrum, Optimism |
| Market Model | Order Book | Hybrid |
| KYC | Currently marked as no-KYC | Currently marked as no-KYC |
| Max Leverage | 50x | 30x |
| Assets | 40+ | 18+ |
| Risk Level | Medium | Medium |
How to Choose
- Research Hyperliquid first if liquidity depth, market coverage, and Hyperliquid L1 matter most.
- Put Aster on the shortlist if lower recorded fees, Arbitrum/Optimism access, and a newer protocol workflow matter more.
- After opening either registration link, verify the official domain, referral code, and page prompts before continuing.
Hyperliquid
Hyperliquid is better suited for users who care about Hyperliquid L1, 0.02%/0.05% fees, 50x max leverage, and 40+ supported assets.
Aster
Aster is better suited for users who care about Arbitrum, Optimism, 0.015%/0.045% fees, 30x max leverage, and 18+ supported assets.
Before continuing, verify that you are on the official page and that the domain, referral code, and page prompts are correct.
Registration Links
Related Articles
FAQ
Which has lower fees, Hyperliquid or Aster?
In the current PerpsHub data snapshot, Aster records lower maker/taker fees than Hyperliquid. Actual fees, campaigns, and rebate rules can change, so verify the official trading screen and documentation before placing orders.
Which is better as a primary trading venue?
Hyperliquid is usually the first venue to research if liquidity depth, market coverage, and a mature order book experience matter most. Aster is a useful candidate if lower recorded fees and Arbitrum/Optimism access are higher priorities.